Back to Topics
Solar Energy

Oklahoma Solar Development Under Scrutiny: Assessing Environmental Risks from Extreme Weather Events in Mayes County

2 months ago
5 min read
1 news sources
Share:
Oklahoma Solar Development Under Scrutiny: Assessing Environmental Risks from Extreme Weather Events in Mayes County

Key Insights

  • Utility-scale solar projects in Mayes County, Oklahoma, face significant environmental risks from extreme weather, including tornadoes and large hail.

  • Damaged solar panels, especially thin-film types, can release hazardous heavy metals into soil and water, requiring specialized waste handling.

  • Early destruction of solar infrastructure by natural disasters may prevent panels from achieving their full energy payback, negating environmental benefits.

  • Proactive risk mitigation, responsible waste management, and transparent communication are crucial for sustainable solar deployment in vulnerable regions.

Pryor, Oklahoma – Mayes County is rapidly emerging as a significant hub for large-scale solar energy development, with three utility-scale projects—Salt Branch, Huckleberry, and Mayes Solar—currently under construction near Pryor. Developed by Leeward Renewable Energy, these facilities are slated to deliver approximately 370 megawatts of generation capacity directly to the grid, with operations anticipated to commence by late 2025. While solar power offers substantial long-term environmental benefits through emission-free electricity generation, the region's susceptibility to extreme weather events has prompted critical discussions among experts and community members regarding potential environmental risks should these installations sustain severe damage.

Oklahoma's history of extreme weather, exemplified by a fatal tornado near Pryor in May 2024 and two EF-1 tornadoes in June 2025, underscores the vulnerability of large-scale infrastructure. A primary concern revolves around the consequences of a direct hit from a tornado or severe hailstorm on a solar farm. Tornadoes can transform solar panels into dangerous airborne debris, posing structural threats to adjacent properties and dispersing hazardous materials across the landscape. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) highlights that damaged panels, particularly those utilizing thin-film technologies, may contain heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, and selenium. If these broken components are left exposed, these substances can leach into soil and water systems, potentially meeting the threshold for hazardous waste and necessitating specialized handling and disposal procedures.

Hail presents another significant risk. Although most photovoltaic panels are engineered to withstand hailstones up to one inch in diameter, Oklahoma frequently experiences larger hailstones capable of cracking or shattering panels. Such damage renders the glass, plastic, and metal components difficult or impossible to recycle, often directing them to landfills as electronic waste. Furthermore, if broken panels are exposed to precipitation prior to cleanup, contaminated runoff could infiltrate local water sources or agricultural lands, posing environmental and public health concerns.

Beyond immediate disaster impacts, the lifecycle of solar panels carries an inherent environmental footprint. Research from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and various peer-reviewed studies indicates that the manufacturing process for solar panels, particularly the mining and refinement of materials like polysilicon and aluminum, is energy-intensive and relies significantly on fossil fuels. While panels typically offset this "energy debt" within 1.5 to 3.5 years of operation, providing clean energy for 25 to 30 years thereafter, early destruction due to severe weather could prevent this environmental payback from being fully realized.

Notably, the Mayes County solar projects do not currently incorporate battery storage, mitigating the specific fire and contamination risks associated with solar-plus-storage facilities observed elsewhere. Nevertheless, the physical infrastructure itself remains susceptible to environmental challenges stemming from damage or long-term degradation. As Mayes County navigates its transition towards a solar-powered future, a comprehensive understanding of environmental concerns—including effective damage cleanup, responsible waste management, and robust risk mitigation strategies—is paramount. Transparent dialogue among developers, local authorities, and residents will be indispensable in balancing the profound benefits of renewable energy with the imperative to safeguard local ecosystems and ensure community well-being.