San Francisco Solar Companies Form Coalition to Combat Local Regulations Hindering Climate Goals
Key Insights
Four leading San Francisco solar companies have formed the San Francisco Solar and Storage Coalition to address local regulations they claim hinder solar adoption.
The coalition asserts increasing city red tape, including new inspections, led to a 50% drop in solar permit approvals in 2025 compared to last year.
Industry executives warn that current regulatory burdens make solar power inaccessible and threaten San Francisco's ambitious 2040 carbon neutrality goal.
The alliance aims to collaborate with city departments to streamline permitting processes and reduce costs, fostering greater renewable energy deployment.
San Francisco's leading solar energy providers are uniting to challenge local regulations they assert are significantly impeding the city's clean energy transition and threatening its ambitious 2040 carbon neutrality target. Four prominent firms—Sutro Power, Luminalt Solar, Albion Power, and Occidental Power, Solar and Energy Storage—have formed the San Francisco Solar and Storage Coalition, a first-of-its-kind builder's association aimed at streamlining the city's permitting processes and reducing installation costs. The coalition formally notified the city of its formation on Friday, signaling a collective effort to address what they describe as "overly burdensome" rules.
John-Paolo Rapagnani, CEO of Sutro Power, highlighted the severity of the issue, stating, "None of us want to attack or condemn any city worker or department. It's clear it's a top down policy issue." This sentiment is echoed by Jeanine Cotter, founder of Luminalt Solar, who emphasized that current regulations "drive up costs, and that make solar power inaccessible to San Franciscans." The coalition alleges that San Francisco has approved 50% fewer solar permits in 2025 compared to the same period last year, a direct consequence of what Cotter terms "rulemaking on top of rulemaking."
While Omran Kelly, a spokesperson for the Department of Building Inspection, stated that there have been no "formal regulatory changes" to solar companies in recent years, the industry group contends that informal standards within existing regulations have evolved to create significant new hurdles. The catalyst for the coalition's formation was an additional inspection requirement for most solar permit applications, reportedly imposed by the San Francisco Fire Department last October. This new mandate, primarily driven by concerns over the flammability of lithium-ion batteries used in energy storage systems, adds another layer of complexity and cost to installations.
The challenges faced by San Francisco's solar industry underscore a broader issue where local bureaucratic complexities can overshadow state and federal incentives, such as California's recent solar incentive program rollbacks or federal clean energy subsidies. The city's commitment to achieving carbon neutrality by 2040 hinges significantly on widespread solar adoption, a goal the coalition argues is unattainable under the current regulatory framework. By uniting, these competitors aim to foster a collaborative dialogue with city departments, advocating for a more efficient and cost-effective regulatory environment that supports, rather than obstructs, the city's climate objectives. The success of this initiative could serve as a critical case study for other municipalities grappling with similar challenges in accelerating their renewable energy transitions.